If it were up to Thierry Aartsen (VVD), Minister of Labor and Social Inclusion, the government would move quickly to introduce a legal presumption of employee status below a certain hourly rate. Aartsen Aartsen announced on Friday, March 6 to to the House of Representatives. Self-employed workers earning less than 38 euros per hour will then be able to more easily claim to an employment contract. But as is often the case with the self-employed issue, this proposal faces a persistent misunderstanding. On social media, the perception is circulating that there will be a strict cutoff: below 38 euros per hour you are an employee, above that you are by definition self-employed person. In short: this isn’t true, and it’s important to know why that is. 

What the legal presumption actually does 

The measure introduces a rebuttable legal presumption for self-employed individuals with a rate below approximately 38 euros per hour (as of January 1, 2027, this amount will be 39 euros per hour). It is very important to note that this presumption does not arise automatically: the worker must first demonstrate that their compensation is below the statutory threshold. Only if they succeed will it be presumed that an employment contract exists. 

This does not, therefore, constitute a complete reversal of the burden of proof. Rather, it involves a gradual shift. First, the worker must substantiate the presumption of employment, starting with the lower rate. After that, a legal presumption arises that works in his or her favor. This does not mean, however, that there will be a strict “rate-based classification,” as is being suggested on social media: for instance, it is claimed that self-employed individuals with an hourly rate above 38 euros per hour are primarily considered self-employed, while those below the 38-euro threshold are primarily subject to an employment contract. That is incorrect: even above 38 euros per hour, there can still be cases of bogus self-employment. At the same time, it is still perfectly possible to work as a self-employed person below 38 euros per hour.

Why “refutable” is the key word

The legal presumption is therefore rebuttable. This means that the client, in turn, can rebut the presumption by presenting specific facts and circumstances that indicate self-employment. 

The judge then considers all the circumstances of the case. These include the degree of authority and supervision, the employee’s organizational placement, the business risk, and the nature and duration of the work.  

As noted earlier, the result is that even if the hourly rate is below 38 euros, the individual may still be considered a self-employed person, since the relevant facts and circumstances remain the determining factor in assessing the employment relationship. There is therefore no automatic transition to employee status.  

What happens above 38 euros 

The finding that you’re “safe” above 38 euros are “safe” as a self-employed person is therefore incorrect. Above that threshold, the legal presumption does not apply. That is basically all there is to it. There is no such thing as a “legalpresumption of independence. The holistic test – based on the perspectives of the Deliverooruling and the constantly evolving case law – remains exactly the same asThis means that even with higher rates, an employment contract may still exist if the factual circumstances indicate so. The rate is not a decisive criterion, but merely one element among many. 

Who is this for?  

According to ZiPconomy , a significant number of self-employed professionals work below the 38-euro-per-hour threshold. About 60 percent of all self-employed professionals (if hired at 38 euros per hour) could, in theory, take advantage of this law. This is evident from a calculation by the Ministry of Social Affairs and Employment based on figures from the Self-Employed Labor Survey (ZEA) conducted by CBS and TNO. This applies to sectors where rates are structurally lower, such as agriculture, hospitality, and transportation and warehousing. 

At the same time, it appears that many of these workers consciously choose self-employment and do not necessarily wish to claim all the rights and social protections that come with an employment contract. This underscores that the legal presumption is not an obligation, but a legal tool that can be utilized. The legal presumption does not alter the definition of a self-employed person or an employee. Anyone who understands this clearly will see that there is little reason for panic (or misplaced joy in the case of self-employed individuals with higher hourly rates).  

On Wednesday, April 15, there will be a debate will take place in the House of Representatives. The House Committee on Social Affairs and Employment will debate the labor market and self-employed workers dossier.  

Request a free consultation

Questions about this? Please contact us.

Sem Overduin
Public Policy & Affairs Manager
Sem.Overduin@headfirst.nl

Oifik Youssefi
Public Affairs Officer

Oifik.Youssefi@headfirst.nl

Maaike van Driel
Head of Legal

Maaike.vanDriel@headfirst.group

Thomas ten Veldhuijs
Senior Legal Counsel

Thomas.tenVeldhuijs@headfirst.nl

Privacy Preference Center