Tomorrow afternoon the Labor Market Policy Committee debate is scheduled. On the parliamentary agenda are a number of important topics, such as the report of the Borstlap Commission and the Labor Market Outline Letter of July 5. Ahead of the debate, Marion van Happen is happy to share her views on the current proposals on the table in political The Hague.
First of all, I would like to emphasize that I am positive about the first outline letter from the Minister of Social Affairs and Employment. The three tracks mentioned - the level playing field, regulatory clarification and improving enforcement - are the right knobs to turn. If seen and dealt with in conjunction, I see the contents of this letter as a step in the right direction.
Established criteria supplemented by sectoral approach
I welcome the attention given to the Belgian Labor Relations Act in the outline letter. The thinking and underlying principles offer an opportunity to replace the DBA law. The Labor Relations Act establishes clear legal criteria for determining whether one is an employee or a self-employed person. Criteria have also been established at the sectoral level for sectors and professions where the likelihood of underpayment or vulnerable entrepreneurship is greatest. This approach increases the effectiveness of enforcement and does more justice to the diversity of self-employed workers.
What also makes enforcement more effective and targeted is the SER's MLT recommendation to introduce a legal presumption of employment below the hourly rate of €35. The SER's proposal thus distinguishes between vulnerable self-employed people and self-reliant self-employed people. This allows the tax authorities to focus on the sectors and professions where self-employed workers are hired under this rate. Clear and legally defined criteria plus a sectoral approach are a good starting point as far as I am concerned.
Embedding in the organization
Then I'll jump to the authority criterion, surely a hot topic in this dossier. In my opinion, this is the crux of the discussion: when can an organization hire a self-employed person for a particular job and when is it an employee? For various reasons, the DBA law has failed to provide this clarity. That the Cabinet recognizes this and is working toward replacing it is crucial.
The Borstlap Commission proposes to modernize the authority criterion by making "embeddedness in the organization" more central to the assessment of the employment relationship. I am not in favor of giving this criterion more weight, because there is already enough debate over the interpretation of when authority exists. When is a worker "embedded in the organization"? And what tasks belong to "the regular work of an organization"? In practice, I see just the opposite happening. Hybrid teams with different specialists working on a project basis on solutions and issues of importance to the organization at that time. These are often teams where there are different forms of contracts. The results of the recently published CBS survey support this picture: employers consider the "type of contract" much less important than previously thought. Factors such as knowledge, expertise and work experience are much more important. Will this soon no longer be possible if we deal too rigidly with authority and embedding in the organization?
Great diversity zzp population
In addition, I question the modernization of one general authority criterion. After all, in the Netherlands we are dealing with a very diverse self-employed population. This group of workers has diverse assignments, works for different hourly rates and the duration of assignments is also very different. One authority criterion for this entire target group will therefore not work in my view. We need more customization.
The web module, in its current form, also does not sufficiently take this diversity into account. It only tests for the aspects of being an employee and does not sufficiently take into account aspects of being self-employed. As a result, the arrow can only move in one direction and that is the direction of "indication of employment.
In the recent budget of the Ministry of Social Affairs and Employment, I read back that the web module is being further developed to provide clarity on the nature of the employment relationship. To make the web module somewhat operational and reliable, I recommend that the questions and assessment also take self-employment into account. This will result in more balance in the answers.
Clear rules first, then enforcement
With regard to enforcement, I read back that enforcement will resume on January 1, 2025. I agree that enforcement needs to be started. The way in which and how this will be rolled out, I still see some bumps in the road. The coalition of industry associations states in their joint letter - quite rightly, by the way - that enforcement will only be effective if the ground rules and criteria are clearly established at the front. For all parties involved - the Tax Office, intermediaries, principals and zzp'ers - this must be clear. My appeal to The Hague is therefore: take the outstretched hand of the industry associations and enter into discussions with implementing organizations about enforceable criteria. Let us as intermediaries be an extension of the implementers. We are pre-eminently the parties in the labor market with knowledge and expertise.
In the coming months we will keep a finger on the pulse and remain involved in relevant developments. At the end of this year I expect more clarity about the next step with the second outline letter and a progress letter 'Working on a self-employed basis'. As the largest HR-tech service provider, we will of course remain in dialogue with our stakeholders in The Hague and will pull together with our partners.
